I can't seem to reply to the 'group', so i'm emailing the group address and 2 vocal people, hoping for the best. apologies if you get this 2x.
something that i would LOVE to see in routes, is this: right now, routes maps like this: map.connect( 'faq_page', 'faq', controller='semi_static', action='faq') for: file - controllers/semi_static.py controller - SemiStaticController method - faq what i'd love is the ability to do something like this map.connect( 'faq_page', 'faq', controller='SemiStatic_Controller', action='faq') see, i hate the automagic mapping of semi_static to SemiStatic_Controller... i could get into a long argument about semantics, but i'll save us from boredom. i just think that if routes were to operate the same way, but also allow explicit controller naming ( identified by _Controller as the suffix ), it would totally rock. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
