On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Gael Pasgrimaud <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It works, but that's a pain if you need to put your Pylons
>> authorization system around it.
>
> It's not a real pain if you use repoze.who/what

Yes, but some people have existing auth code (and logging code) which
is working and would be too much work to port to repoze.who.

Ben wrote:
> I'd be curious to look over Jonathan's approach a bit more, if a 'standard' 
> definition for how the controllers should be pulled in, and how to extend the 
> template search paths properly could be reached, that would probably be the 
> simplest scheme that retains the separateness of a package for maintaining 
> versions, while still being easy enough to customize.

The most difficult problem seems to be controllers, and the
'controller_scan' argument in Routes which seems useless.  (We had to
hardcode the controllers in our GUI BILS app because of some
incompatibility with py2exe.)  Several people have asked how to have
controllers in various packages and then pull in a selection of them.
The simplest method is stub modules in the controllers directory that
import the actual controllers.  But maybe we can find something more
flexible.

-- 
Mike Orr <[email protected]>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to