On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Michael Merickel <mich...@merickel.org>wrote:
> It's funny you should ask. :-) > > http://michael.merickel.org/2011/8/23/outgrowing-pyramid-handlers/ > On Aug 24, 2011 6:24 AM, "Graham Higgins" <gjhigg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Q: Are using Handlers kinda frowned upon? Coming from Pylons and > > sorta at a fork-in-the-road of whether I should just abandon my old > habits > > or not > > > > raydeo: they are fine.. you don't gain a lot by using them though, > > especially if > > you don't care about dispatching to a view based on {action} > > patterns > > raydeo: and in 1.2 that will be solved more directly using just regular > > views > > raydeo: in general I would describe handlers as a crutch :-) > To clarify on that point, I wasn't knocking the concept of controllers/handlers as much as I was talking about the usefulness of the pyramid_handlers package versus doing the class-based views directly in Pyramid. -- Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
