> How come you guys aren't using ZopeTransactionExtension for this , i.e. > http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid/en/1.2-branch/tutorials/wiki2/basiclayout.html#content-models-with-models-py? > My understanding is that session scope should be entirely handled in > that case. >
I'm using a non-global session setup, similar to what's described here: http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid_cookbook/en/latest/sqla.html#using-a-non-global-session, and the code above seemed like the simplest way to ensure the session gets closed without adding another dependency. At a glance, I don't like the idea of having to `import transaction`. That said, I haven't really looked at the ZopeTransactionExtension. What is the advantage to doing `transaction.commit|abort` vs. `session.commit|rollback`? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pylons-discuss/-/OoGyNum7zbkJ. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
