On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Iain Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, was interested in getting some subjective opinions on why one > might use either FormEncode or Collander. We've been using formencode, so > I'm curious as to motivations to switch and experience doing so. >
colander is actually a schema library used by deform, which is a form library. You probably mean deform, not colander. I've worked on a project that went from FormEncode to Formish, and have now worked on a project that uses deform. The only thing I've been able to conclude so far is I really don't like form libraries. That said, I'd probably use deform now over formencode. But not for any reason I can articulate at the moment. People seem to like flatland. I intend to at least check it out at some point. Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
