On 18.03.2014 14:08, Chris Rossi wrote:
> It should start its own connection via the standard ZODB API.  You might
> consider moving the extra work to a different process.  Redis pub/sub or
> list objects are good ways to communicate and set up a primitive, simple
> queue.  I prefer that to more complex queue/messaging frameworks.  YMMV.

Right now I have no ZEO running. In Production there will be a ZEO but
while developing a ZEO server simply adds to complexity and makes
debugging even more pain in the ass.

It might solve me problem if I could start a worker thread at
application start an send the task via queue there but there is still
the problem to get a thread with access to the zodb started. I know that
it's possible to use one ZODB connection in multiple threads, Zope does
it and pyramid does it. The question is how to fork a new subconnection
or transaction and pass it to the new thread.

Regards
   Estartu

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gerhard Schmidt    | http://www.augusta.de/~estartu/    |
Fischbachweg 3     |                                    | PGP Public Key
86856 Hiltenfingen | JabberID: [email protected]       |  auf Anfrage/
Tel: 08232 77 36 4 |                                    |   on request
Fax: 08232 77 36 3 |                                    |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to