Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Aug 8, 2009, at 4:33, b...@janssen.org (Bill Janssen) wrote: > > > I was building on an as-yet unreleased version of a popular operating > > system the other day, and found that jcc failed to build, because > > jni.h > > is no longer installed where one might expect it to be. Don't know if > > this condition will persist when this version of the OS is actually > > released, but right now it's a bit of a show-stopper. > > Indeed. There is no JCC without JNI. > Java without JNI... the jail would be airtight. > > Andi..
Well, yes and no. The headers (jni.h) might properly be considered part of the developer kit, rather than the runtime kit. Lots of Linux distributions separate runtime and developer components. Just a heads-up that the default location of headers for this Malus build may change in the near future. Though I think it's worth waiting to see what the release has in it. Bill
