On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:49:03 +0200, Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:29, Christian Heimes <li...@cheimes.de> wrote:
Am 27.09.2010 03:59, schrieb Andi Vajda:
In 3.x and trunk, I've been porting ICU-dependant Lucene contrib
features to
use PyICU [1][2] (which depends on C++ ICU). I think that having
PyLucene
depend both on C++ ICU and Java ICU is one ICU too many :-), though.
I'm not sure at this point which should remain. There are advantages to
both... I'm open to arguments in favor of either. You can see examples
in
the 3.x tree [3].
When can we expect a new release of PyLucene with ICU support?
Once Lucene Java releases 3.1 and we decide here which ICU we want to
use. I'm leaning towards C++ ICU with PyICU but I'm biased. Does the ICU
stuff you see now on the PyLucene 3.x branch work well for you ?
I hope we get some results next week. Maybe earlier but some other stuff
is distracting us atm.
dirk + christian
