I wish some guy who is good at linux can release a rpm version(Fedora Core3) of pymol. Compiling pymol on my linux for linux newbiee like me is really an unforgetable experience and I don't want to do it again. But , I really like pymol.
在 2005-01-16日的 20:16 -0800，[email protected]写道： > Send PyMOL-users mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of PyMOL-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. PyMOL on Dual-CPU Workstations (Warren DeLano) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > From: "Warren DeLano" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 14:34:37 -0800 > Subject: [PyMOL] PyMOL on Dual-CPU Workstations > > PyMOL Users: > > For those of you who like to keep up with the numbers, I just ran some new > PyMOL CPU benchmarks on dual-processor unix workstations based on the > Intel/Xeon, the Apple/G5, and our brand new AMD/Opteron. These aren't top > models, but rather affordable systems with performance within 20-25% of top > models. > > The point here was to see on which workstation you will wait less when > ray-tracing or calculating geometries like surfaces, given the latest PyMOL > optimizations. Graphics performance wasn't compared since that depends > mainly on the video card. > > http://delsci.com/bench > > The take home lesson: As far as PyMOL is concerned, you can't go wrong with > any of the three -- they're all within 20% of one another, with the G5 and > Opteron being almost identical Ghz for Ghz, and with both of them getting > 40-60% more work done per Ghz than the Pentium 4 Xeon. > > It is striking however that the G5 and the Opteron are so similar in > performance given that typical dual Opteron systems have a base price $1,300 > higher than a Mac dual G5. If only stereo 3D (in a window) was available on > the Mac, then it would be the obvious 64-bit platform of choice for > molecular visualization. > > Cheers, > Warren > > -- > Warren L. DeLano, Ph.D. > Principal Scientist > > . DeLano Scientific LLC > . 400 Oyster Point Blvd., Suite 213 > . South San Francisco, CA 94080 > . Biz:(650)-872-0942 Tech:(650)-872-0834 > . Fax:(650)-872-0273 Cell:(650)-346-1154 > . mailto:[email protected] > > > > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users > > > End of PyMOL-users Digest -- Shiyong Liu 86-10-62757520 Wellcome to MDL [email protected] http://mdl.ipc.pku.edu.cn/~syliu
