my experience shows that when you have two HETATM residues one after another, 
pymol never shows this bond because the crystallographer never put a CONECT 
record for it, which pymol wants.

eg for 1674, there is not CONECT showing 1676 as being bonded and since they 
are HETATM , pymol decides to use the CONECT records.

-David

> On Dec 23, 2014, at 12:20 AM, Jordan Willis <jwillis0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know why PyMoL renders the PDBs 3U2S and 3U4E without connecting 
> backbone atoms at residue 100G and 100H? Are the bond distances for these two 
> residue types not within the right parameters? SimpleViewer and JalView both 
> bridge this connection.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jordan
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
> _______________________________________________
> PyMOL-users mailing list (PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net)
> Info Page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
PyMOL-users mailing list (PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net)
Info Page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net

Reply via email to