On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:20:28 -0400, Rick Gerkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > For the latter, all dependencies are 64-bit > > > libraries except for MSVCR90.dll, MSVCP90.dll, the boost_python dll > > > mentioned above, python26.dll, and the _cl.pyd I am examining. For the > > next > > > step in getting this to work, I don't what of all this is relevant. > > Should > > > I abandon trying to make it work in a 64-bit OS? Has anyone ever made it > > > work in 64-bit Windows? > > > > I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here--which ones are > > 64-bit, and which ones are 32? Wouldn't they all need to be 64-bit? > > > > OK, you're probably right that they should all be 64-bit. I imagine I can > find 64-bit version of each of them, except _CL.pyd. I don't know why the > pyOpenCl build script didn't try to build me a 64-bit version. Maybe it was > just matching the bit-depth of its immediate dependencies (e.g. > Python26.dll, BoostPython-VC90-MT-1.43.dll). Perhaps I should work from the > bottom and try to get/build 64-bit dll's all the way up. Is it known > whether anyone has built a 64-bit _CL.pyd in Windows?
As far as I know, the PyOpenCL build will try to match the Python interpreter with which it is being built. HTH, Andreas
pgpd2ceWn2UWG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ PyOpenCL mailing list [email protected] http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pyopencl
