On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Andreas Kloeckner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Patric, > > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:28:40 +0200, Patric Holmvall <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Of course! That's my opinion too. As I said though, I'm probably not >> experienced enough to make it into a patch. I guess you have too much on >> your plate to fix it at the moment? >> By the way, we found a bug in the current PRNG. The mean value and variance >> decays to very low values after a while. All the more reason to get it >> updated. You'll probably get more info about it from my colleague soon. >> >> Maybe we could make a request or something on the mailing list? There ought >> to be a demand for a better PRNG. > > I just found this email at the bottom of my inbox--just wanted to make > sure you know that PyOpenCL 2011.2 (just released) comes with RANLUXCL. > > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > PyOpenCL mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pyopencl >
Any of you guys looked at Random123 yet? http://www.deshawresearch.com/resources_random123.html I saw a talk about it at SC11 this year and it looked very promising for a CUDA/OpenCL PRNG _______________________________________________ PyOpenCL mailing list [email protected] http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pyopencl
