Tomasz Rybak <[email protected]> writes: > First - general comment. > I quite like an idea of changing PyOpenCL to work with PyPy. > Can I assume that this is just for PyOpenCL, and PyCUDA stays > Boost (and thus CPython) only for now?
Yep, I have no plans currently to port PyCUDA to cffi. If someone decided to do that, I'd be supportive, but for now only PyOpenCL will support PyPy. > I do not know yet how packaging will look like for package > that both supports CPython and PyPy - I'll need to check that. To be safe, I think pyopencl-bpl and pyopencl-cffi should be two different packages, perhaps with a virtual package for dependencies to use. pyopencl-cffi works on both CPython and PyPy, so it'd be nice if the package exposed that. The two packages should conflict with each other because they both supply a module called "pyopencl". > As for testing in the wild - if I'm able to build PyPy > version I hope to be able to upload it to Debian experimental, > so interested Debian users could test it. I think that > some separate versioning for PyPy version will help here. Great. PyPy's numpy isn't packaged yet, and PyPy 2.3 (which fixes a lot of bugs, thus making all of this possible) is only a recent addition to the Debian archive. [1] https://bitbucket.org/pypy/numpy Andreas
pgpVbCkNSCJle.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ PyOpenCL mailing list [email protected] http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pyopencl
