Dnia 2015-09-08, wto o godzinie 15:22 -0500, Andreas Kloeckner pisze: > Tomasz Rybak <[email protected]> writes: > > As I'm not using PyOpenCL every day, I abstained from vote. > > But - what's the result? If there was such a change, I'd like > > to describe it in Debian package changelog to warn users. > > The complex numbers support was changed as described, since I didn't > hear loud objections. I think this change, while incompatible, is > overall a win because it turned up a number of subtle bugs in my code > that were hidden by the vector nature of the prior complex number > implementation.
OK, thanks for information - I've added note about this change to Debian.NEWS; it'll be displayed to users when they update PyOpenCL. Best regards. -- Tomasz Rybak GPG/PGP key ID: 2AD5 9860 Fingerprint A481 824E 7DD3 9C0E C40A 488E C654 FB33 2AD5 9860 http://member.acm.org/~tomaszrybak
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ PyOpenCL mailing list [email protected] http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pyopencl
