Gregor Thalhammer <[email protected]> writes: > Ah, you are right, this possibility did not come to my mind. Sorry for > the confusion. My initial concern was that ‚a.x + b.x' is slightly > less obvious and readable than 'a.real + b.real‘, so I sorted out any > other possibility that is significantly more convoluted. Honestly, I > do not see the advantage of using 'TPROOT##_real(a)‘ instead of ‚a.x‘, > especially in terms of readability. But if you prefer it, it would not > be a big issue to change it that way.
(Although that's not currently very well documented, ) I would like to phase out .x and .y with time, since as identifiers they really don't make a whole lot of sense in a complex numbers setting. That's why I'd prefer not to perpetuate their use. Andreas _______________________________________________ PyOpenCL mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pyopencl
