I vaguely remember Alex mentioned a while ago he wants to make everything in wheel (except the command "wheel" itself) internal. They are also more likely to break than distutils, which is more or less frozen.
See also: https://github.com/pypa/wheel/issues/262 Eric Peterson於 2019年3月6日星期三 UTC+8上午1時19分17秒寫道： > > > > On Mar 5, 2019, at 11:47 AM, Paul Moore <p.f....@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > The output of that last command is something like > 'my_package-0.1-py2.py3-none-any', which is what I need (along with the > ".whl" extension, of course). > > > That looks reasonable. > > My concern is that it feels like we're using some private APIs here, e.g., > having to call ensure_finalized(). Is this the right way to be doing this? > > > Basically all of the distutils APIs are to a greater or lesser extent > unsupported. They aren't "private" as such, but they are also mostly > undocumented and the only way of knowing for sure what they do is to > read the source. > > So I'd say, if it works for you, then go for it. > > > Ok sounds good—I'm prepared to deal with (slow-ish) API changes if they > come, and it sounds like our approach is about what would be expected. > > Thanks a lot, Paul & Daniel. >
