Author: Carl Friedrich Bolz <[email protected]> Branch: extradoc Changeset: r3747:deffc51bf85b Date: 2011-06-20 10:07 +0200 http://bitbucket.org/pypy/extradoc/changeset/deffc51bf85b/
Log: fix XXX diff --git a/talk/iwtc11/paper.tex b/talk/iwtc11/paper.tex --- a/talk/iwtc11/paper.tex +++ b/talk/iwtc11/paper.tex @@ -832,9 +832,11 @@ it. Benchmarks have been executed for a few different interpreters and we see improvements in several cases. The ideal loop for this optimization would be short numerical calculations with no failing guards and no -external calls. - -XXX reason why we use small numerical kernels for benchmarks +external calls. Larger loops involving many operations on complex objects +typically benefit less from it. Loop peeling never makes performance worse, in +the worst case the peeled loop is exactly the same as the preamble. Therefore we +chose to present benchmarks of small numeric kernels where loop peeling can show +its use. XXX we either need to explain that we use C++ or consistently use C _______________________________________________ pypy-commit mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-commit
