Author: Wouter van Heyst <[email protected]>
Branch: extradoc
Changeset: r340:3928f55afd97
Date: 2012-03-08 15:51 +0200
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy.org/changeset/3928f55afd97/

Log:    Fix some typos in source/tmdonate.txt.

diff --git a/source/tmdonate.txt b/source/tmdonate.txt
--- a/source/tmdonate.txt
+++ b/source/tmdonate.txt
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 
 This proposal is about researching and implementing Transactional Memory
 in PyPy.  This is a technique that recently came to the front of the
-multi-core scene.  It promizes to offer multi-core CPU usage without
+multi-core scene.  It promises to offer multi-core CPU usage without
 requiring to fall back to the multi-process solutions described above,
 and also without using the ``threading`` module --- just as a small,
 local extension of the programming language that would be used only in
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
 --------------------------------
 
 This is a classic criticism of research-oriented projects.  We believe
-that the `work plan`_ plan below can make a serious impact on considering
+that the `work plan`_ below can make a serious impact on considering
 possible a GIL-less Python.  We believe we can do it, but at the
 very least, even if this work generates a negative result, the negative
 result will document the challenges faced should someone else want to
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@
 alternatives.  In particular, small quickly-written programs don't need
 the additional baggage of cross-process communication, and large
 programs can sometimes be almost impossible to turn into multi-process
-versions.  By constrast, we believe that TM can fit naturally into most
+versions.  By contrast, we believe that TM can fit naturally into most
 programs, because it only requires local changes to some dispatcher; the
 rest of the program should work without changes.
 
_______________________________________________
pypy-commit mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-commit

Reply via email to