Author: Carl Friedrich Bolz <[email protected]>
Branch: extradoc
Changeset: r4608:7558b62df27a
Date: 2012-08-16 13:39 +0200
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/extradoc/changeset/7558b62df27a/
Log: make pdf compile again
diff --git a/talk/vmil2012/zotero.bib b/talk/vmil2012/zotero.bib
--- a/talk/vmil2012/zotero.bib
+++ b/talk/vmil2012/zotero.bib
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@
abstract = {The dynamic and reflective features of programming
languages are powerful constructs that programmers often mention as extremely
useful. However, the ability to modify a program at runtime can be both a
boon-in terms of flexibility-, and a curse-in terms of tool support. For
instance, usage of these features hampers the design of type systems, the
accuracy of static analysis techniques, or the introduction of optimizations by
compilers. In this paper, we perform an empirical study of a large Smalltalk
codebase- often regarded as the poster-child in terms of availability of these
features-, in order to assess how much these features are actually used in
practice, whether some are used more than others, and in which kinds of
projects. These results are useful to make informed decisions about which
features to consider when designing language extensions or tool support.},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 8th Working Conference on Mining
Software Repositories},
publisher = {{ACM}},
- author = {Callaú, Oscar and Robbes, Romain and Tanter, Éric
and Röthlisberger, David},
+ author = {Callaú, Oscar and Robbes, Romain and Tanter, {\'{E}} and
Röthlisberger, David},
year = {2011},
keywords = {dynamic languages, smalltalk, static analysis},
pages = {23–32}
@@ -271,4 +271,4 @@
year = {1994},
keywords = {interactivity, recompilation, self},
pages = {229--243}
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
_______________________________________________
pypy-commit mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-commit