Author: Armin Rigo <[email protected]>
Branch: py3.5
Changeset: r88495:818fb73d805d
Date: 2016-11-20 16:54 +0100
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/changeset/818fb73d805d/
Log: Using check_impl_detail() like this is not following the spirit of
check_impl_detail(), which should be: "if false, avoid checking some
detail", not "if false, check that the value is really different".
Removed anyway, as it seems pypy gives the same answer as cpython
nowadays.
diff --git a/lib-python/3/test/test_index.py b/lib-python/3/test/test_index.py
--- a/lib-python/3/test/test_index.py
+++ b/lib-python/3/test/test_index.py
@@ -66,10 +66,7 @@
direct_index = my_int.__index__()
operator_index = operator.index(my_int)
self.assertEqual(direct_index, 8)
- if support.check_impl_detail():
- self.assertEqual(operator_index, 7)
- else:
- self.assertEqual(operator_index, 8)
+ self.assertEqual(operator_index, 7)
# Both results should be of exact type int.
self.assertIs(type(direct_index), int)
#self.assertIs(type(operator_index), int)
@@ -90,10 +87,7 @@
bad_int = BadInt2()
n = operator.index(bad_int)
- if support.check_impl_detail():
- self.assertEqual(n, 0)
- else:
- self.assertEqual(n, 1)
+ self.assertEqual(n, 0)
class SeqTestCase:
_______________________________________________
pypy-commit mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-commit
