Holger Krekel wrote: > > All i all, i think that we probably want to checkout joeq > some more. In particular, we might want to think about > trying to generate a QUAD representation of PyPy and reuse > some of the joeq infrastructure. We can expect to have less > integration issues than with the Low-Level-Virtual-Machine > (LLVM) project which is written in C++ (ever worked with > C++-libraries and dependencies? funfunfun). >
C++ is an Industry standard based on C. C++ Libraries can be wrapped by C-Libraries (extern 'C') if you have the source-code at hand. C++ Libraries that are not wrapped can contain native C++ (for example class definitions). Then they can be called by C++ code only. It is not possible to call C++ Libraries which are compiled with a different Compiler, because all C++ Implementations have different naming conventions for methods and parameters(name mangling). I don't say LLVM is better for PyPy than joeq. But I think it should be first considered what is right and second what is easy to implement. regards Guenter _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
