Hi Samuele, On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Samuele Pedroni wrote: > that what I was implicitly thinking with "be lists". My point anyway was > simply that for Java the first relevant thing is to dinstiguish > constant-size lists (the code in listobject uses such things) vs. > variable size lists, and both then have natural reprs.
Ah: I didn't realize that listobject's "ob_item" was never resized. I though that _list_resize() would extend the existing list object, but instead it creates a new one and assigns it to "w_self.ob_item". I was insisting on this point based on this misunderstanding, sorry. Indeed, it looks much easier to just detect that "ob_item" never changes its size, and use a plain Java array because of that. Armin _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
