Michael Hudson wrote:
...

Hmm!  Could we use this to make an interpreter-level implementation of
the argument parsing code from a nice clear application level
implementation?  Or does this still result in hideous circularities?
Probably.  Oh well.

I think we could try this. We can look at circularities quite easily. Just for fun, I have run genrpy twice over a function. That creates the whole interpreter as a nice single huge Python source file. Although this doesn't make too much sense for producing the 'real' code, it procides a new way to do source analysis. You know that everything is in the file, the whole interpreter, you can single step, add debug calls, whatsoever, without having to hack around in the real sources.

well, I'll continue with this. Would like to run the huge file.
At the moment, I have real trouble with old-style class
instances. No idea how to create them, they seem to
be not correctly wrapped.

cheers - chris
--
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tismerysoft GmbH             :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9A     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 802 86 56  mobile +49 173 24 18 776  fax +49 30 80 90 57 05
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
     whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Reply via email to