Hi Armin, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15/06/2005 14:36:15:
> Hi Ben, > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 02:04:35PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > After all my pointless question asking, I thought it would be best if I > > actually contributed something. > > Thanks! I removed the NULL, because the array is actually nested in the > structure; it's not a pointer to an array. Thanks for the fix, though. > Doh! Thats me thinking in C++ (where I'd allocate the variable bit seperately), and not this c-ish allocate an a struct, but with extra mem. > Do you know if VC++ is equally unhappy about empty structure > initializers? (It could be the case that some of our struct > declarations are empty; I don't know if there is a test showing that > behavior at the moment) > I not really sure. All the tests seem to pass, but thats not really an indicator. I'll investigate and let you know. Cheers, Ben > > Armin > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
