On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:14:46 +0200, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
>[snip]
>> Of course the lesson of this is that benchmarks are worthless :-).
>
>Cool! I'll go tell everybody that PyPy is already faster than CPython
>now. :)
>
>The best benchmarks will be large real-world codebases running on PyPy.

This is precisely the reason I'm putting effort into getting the twisted unit 
tests to run on top of PyPy. Once we get the tests running on translated pypy, 
we can add a column to the http://twistedmatrix.com/buildbot/ builder, and get 
PyPy up as a platform we can run a harsh series of non-trivial unit tests on.

My work on this has stalled currently as there are a couple bugs in 
translation, but with the work Lawrence is doing on things like the posix 
module and fcntl, we're well on our way to being able to get this going.

FWIW, i've already managed to get twisted to run its own unit tests on its unit 
testing engine (trial) using py.py. Once we get fcntl translatable, I hope to 
report what happens when I run the lot (2764 tests) under pypy-c and 'see what 
happens'.

250 tests took approximately 11 hours to run.

Stephen.
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Reply via email to