> As well as some of your commits have broken JS tests. I'm not totally
> convinced that my attempt (returning void) is better than your (not
> returning void), but please at least run JS tests and check if nothing
> is broken. If you brake something, but you're totally convinced  
> that I'm
> the one who should fix something please at least contact me, I  
> would be
> happy to sort things out.

My sincere apologies!  I was trying to be careful not to break  
things, but evidently not careful enough.  I will make sure to run  
the JS tests in the future --- I didn't in the past because I assumed  
I did not have the required software.

Regarding the change to get_ and set_field to make it ignore Void  
arguments, I ported that from the CLI code --- I mentioned it on IRC  
and people thought it was a good idea.  I don't really understand too  
well whether it is necessary or not, but I am afraid that your change  
might break the CLI tests, as previously they relied upon their own  
version of the GetField MetaVM op which *did* ignore the Void  
operations.

Again, my apologies for breaking things. :)


Niko

_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Reply via email to