On 6/28/07, Carl Friedrich Bolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jacub! > > 2007/6/28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Author: jlg > > Date: Thu Jun 28 15:49:30 2007 > > New Revision: 44599 > > > > Modified: > > pypy/dist/pypy/lang/scheme/TODO.txt > > pypy/dist/pypy/lang/scheme/object.py > > pypy/dist/pypy/lang/scheme/test/test_parser.py > > Log: > > RPython direction for object.py > > > > Modified: pypy/dist/pypy/lang/scheme/object.py > > ============================================================================== > > --- pypy/dist/pypy/lang/scheme/object.py (original) > > +++ pypy/dist/pypy/lang/scheme/object.py Thu Jun 28 15:49:30 2007 > > @@ -139,10 +139,16 @@ > > raise NotImplementedError > > > > def add_lst(ctx, lst): > > - return apply_lst(ctx, lambda x, y: x + y, lst) > > + def adder(x, y): > > + return x + y > > + > > + return apply_lst(ctx, adder, lst) > > > > def mul_lst(ctx, lst): > > - return apply_lst(ctx, lambda x, y: x * y, lst) > > + def multiplier(x, y): > > + return x * y > > + > > + return apply_lst(ctx, multiplier, lst) > > > > def apply_lst(ctx, fun, lst): > > acc = None > > > > This doesn't make mul_lst and add_lst any more rpython than before. In > fact, lambda is fully rpython. The problem with this code is rather > that you cannot have local functions in RPython.
I that case error messages from pylint: E:142:add_lst.<lambda>: Using unavailable keyword 'lambda' E:145:mul_lst.<lambda>: Using unavailable keyword 'lambda' Causes only confusion. > As I said, don't worry about making your code RPython too much yet. I will try to refrain. Cheers, Jakub Gustak _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
