On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 15:09 +0200, Antonio Cuni wrote: > Carl Friedrich wrote: > > > While I agree, to do this we would have to come up with a name for the > > translation toolchain part. And coming up with names is even harder than > > coming up with logos. > > it's also unclear how to split the sources: e.g., pypy/interpreter/ belongs > to > both. > the interpreter is needed for abstract interpretation, true - but does it maybe make sense to eventually decouple these rpython analysis capabilities from how/which Python version/bytecodes are implemented for our Python interpreter offering?
best, holger _______________________________________________ pypy-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
