On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Antonio Cuni <anto.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13/09/10 10:14, Armin Rigo wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I don't think it's hideable. >> >> Sorry, I wasn't clear. I'm not really trying to hide it. But I'm >> also not really trying to push it forward (which seems to be what >> creating a website for it would do). > > well, I don't think that hiding it or pushing it backward is a good idea. In > theory, we would like if other people start to use rpython to write > interpreters. > > What we don't like is to use rpython as a general purpose language, but that's > a slightly different issue, IMHO.
Is it really about interpreters? (what's interpreter-specific after all in RPython) or is it just that it's hard to use and does not integrate with CPython well? > > ciao, > Anto > _______________________________________________ pypy-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
