On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 13:48 -0500, Alex Gaynor wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:46 PM, holger krekel <hol...@merlinux.eu> wrote: > > > Hi all, especially devs at Pycon, > > > > FYI i just saw saw some tweets from Ikan Lan (http://twitter.com/#!/ikai ) > > who works with the Google App Engine time, oldest to newest: > > > > At the Python VM panel. I want to believe alternate VMs are about > > more than just benchmarks. Question do not agree with me #pycon > > > > For instance, I want to see the tooling that can be built around > > alternative VMs. Profilers, heap analyzers, better debuggers #pycon > > > > Python VM implementors think sandboxing is not something that should > > be implemented at VM layer. Oh, well. #pycon > > > > To me, this does not seem to be fitting for PyPy, does it? > > Maybe somebody can discuss a bit with him. I still believe that Google > > and GAE are a potentially very good application of PyPy tech. > > > > That's a bit confusing IMO. Maciej, Frank, and Dino all said that their VM > supports sandboxing, but it shouldn't be implemente din a python specific > way because Python is such a big language. Not sure why someone would want > Python specific sandboxing.
Ah, indeed confusing. I would describe PyPy's sandobxing to be at VM level as opposed to approaches that rather try to limit access to attributes or recursively control by proxies on top of a VM. best, holger _______________________________________________ pypy-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
