On 30/03/11 19:37, fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote: > My thoughts here are taking a very primitive step - that is run the > JVM translation and look at the generated Java - then see what needs > to be modified so that I could use the generated Java parser from > Jython. At this stage I would be using PyPy exactly the way I use > ANTLR now - as a parser generator. There wouldn't be any need at all > for calling into Java code (as far as I can think of).
yes, I think it makes sense. Actually, as Leonardo says we don't generate java code but assembler which is converted to .class by jasmin. However, it should not change anything. > I think if we > Jython developers get some experience with PyPY - we might be able to > help with the task of calling into Java from PyPy - since we know a > bit about that :) that would be extremely cool :-) Ok, so if Ademan tells me that he's not going to work on the ootype-virtualref branch, I'll try to finish the work so you can start playing with it. ciao, Anto _______________________________________________ pypy-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
