Sven, If we use the overlapping bits approach, let me update that part of the patch.
You can add the changes to fields, but don't add the rldicXXX changes in ppc_assembler.py Thanks, David On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Sven Hager <sven.ha...@uni-duesseldorf.de> wrote: > On 08/11/2011 09:42 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: >> >> Attached is a new patch that corrects the PPC fields. >> >> The only simple way I can think of handling the 64 bit immediate shift >> field is by adding a keyword argument to Field to ignore overlap. >> Expressing the details of the field splitting will be complicated and >> doesn't seem worth it. >> >> Is there a preference for the current patch that explicitly performs >> the conversion or a new argument to ignore overlap? >> >> Thanks, David > > Hello David, > > I think it is okay to add an attribute to class Field which > explicitly allows overlapping bits. It is very easy to adapt > the existing code in form.py to this. > > I will add your changes tomorrow. > > Best regards, > Sven > _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
