On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Armin Rigo <ar...@tunes.org> wrote: > > I suppose that we need to *have* a pypy3 first, before any > conversation like that really makes sense. Last March this wasn't > even being considered. Now it is maybe in some very draftish early > planning stage.
The idea is to be proactive in policy making instead of allowing the problem to be acute like with CPython. -Aaron DeVore _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
