On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Samuel Vaiter <samuel.vai...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for you answer. > > > >> Yes, there are definitely small things that you can work on. > >> > >> A good start would be to pick a missing feature from numpy and start > >> implementing it. There is usually someone on IRC who can help if you > >> have some immediate questions. > >> > >> Do you want me to find you some small thing? > >> > > Yeah, it might be a good thing for a start to have a "tutor" if you > > have the time to think about it. > > > > Hi > > I'm on holiday now but maybe I can think about something. Alex: any idea? > > Cheers, > fijal > _______________________________________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > pypy-dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev > Adding new ufuncs is a great introductory task to numpy. I'm not sure which ones we're missing, but I'm sure we are :) You could also add Python-ufunc support, that is the ability to create a ufunc from a Python function. This shouldn't be too difficult. Alex -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev