Hi Travis, On 28 May 2014 20:18, Travis Jensen <travis.jen...@oracle.com> wrote: > I've been following pypy for a while and have thought it would be fun to get > involved. Recently, I've been wondering what python with tail call > optimization would look like (I'm disgruntled by GVR's decision :), and > realized this might be a good way for me to get involved in pypy.
About this topic, we stick with Guido's language design and don't want a PyPy in which a number of frames may be skipped from tracebacks. Now, if you don't want to change the official PyPy but just play around for fun, then yes, PyPy is a good choice. You'd have to tweak the interpreter, around the files interpreter/pyframe.py and interpreter/pyopcode.py, as well as the bytecode compiler in interpreter/astcompiler/. A bientôt, Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
