Thank you for the quick answer. Just making sure I was understanding which layer was being discussed. The addition of byte codes is what made me question if it was a deeper issue.
-Mark > On Jul 11, 2014, at 9:17, Armin Rigo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Mark, > >> On 11 July 2014 18:11, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: >> Does this mean that you cannot implement an interpreter for a language >> requiring TCO with PyPy/RPython? > > No, why? You write the interpreter you want. For example Pyrolog has > TCO, as required by Prolog. It doesn't have guaranteed complete > tracebacks, which is probably what Prolog people want anyway. > > > A bientôt, > > Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
