Hi, this looks interesting, but from a quick look it seems they are only offering a C++ API? In that case, it might be better/easier to wrap it through cppyy than cffi.
Also, did Travis told you what are the plans for scipy? On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Armin Rigo <ar...@tunes.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Feedback, from Travis Oliphant at EuroPython: libdynd > (https://github.com/ContinuumIO/libdynd) might be the longer-term > future of NumPy, and it looks like it would be much more natural to > bind to it from PyPy (via cffi). Worth a look I believe. It > certainly looks to me like such a cffi binding would be much more > user-friendly than numpypy, in the sense that missing functionality > would be far easier to contribute back. > > > A bientôt, > > Armin. > _______________________________________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > pypy-dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev >
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
