IMHO, there's a part of an old "saying":

[...]
Errors should never pass silently.
Unless explicitly silenced.

So I'd say better to have users deal with the RuntimeError, and document it
in the CPython diferences page.


2015-01-11 14:26 GMT-05:00 Alex Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com>:

> IMO, it's clear that CPython intends this to be "undefined behavior",
> raising a RuntimeError is a perfectly acceptable undefined behavior IMO --
> better than corrupting the data.
>
> For __eq__ and __reversed__ and popitem(last=False) we can just have
> functions in __pypy__ and call them from class OrderedDict(dict): in
> collections I think?
>
> Alex
>
> On Sun Jan 11 2015 at 11:20:55 AM Armin Rigo <ar...@tunes.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Laura,
>>
>> On 11 January 2015 at 19:57, Laura Creighton <l...@openend.se> wrote:
>> > Can we talk the CPython developers into raising RunTimeError for
>> > concurrent modifications?
>>
>> No, we can't expect them to change that:
>> http://bugs.python.org/issue19414 shows they have no plan to have
>> well-defined behavior (either RuntimeError or well-defined results).
>>
>> So for us, the question is if it makes sense for us to break
>> compatibility with CPython 2.7 in this undocumented aspect by arguing
>> that CPython's sometimes bogus results shows it was never meant to
>> work at all (which is true), or if instead we should go the opposite
>> way and offer some well-defined results that generalizes the partially
>> working results of CPython (which would make people happy but is
>> harder to implement).
>>
>> Note that I would be fine if we can't find any existing program that
>> relies on this.  Then we can decide to implement the RuntimeError
>> solution.  If and when somebody files a PyPy bug report, we can argue
>> again.
>>
>>
>> A bientôt,
>>
>> Armin.
>> _______________________________________________
>> pypy-dev mailing list
>> pypy-dev@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pypy-dev mailing list
> pypy-dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Reply via email to