Thank you very much on working towards 3.5 guys.
As users we can forget about 3.6 for now since 3.5 gives a lot of
improvment that most of us are looking for (asyn await and co ).
Would like to see it released soon , PyPy 3.5 is only thing we are waiting
, to move forward from python 2.7.x


On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 12:47 AM Philip Jenvey <pjen...@underboss.org>
wrote:

>
> > On Dec 24, 2016, at 1:54 AM, Armin Rigo <armin.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Philip,
> >
> > Can we get a discussion with respect to Python 3.6?  I see that you
> > created a "py3.6" branch.  However, the people funded by Mozilla (like
> > me) are more interested in finishing a good 3.5.x version first.  (I
> > suppose it's up to discussion if we decide to go for 3.6 immediately,
> > but I guess the answer is no.)
> >
> > That means we'll keep releasing 3.5 versions and won't look into 3.6
> > before next summer.  It's unclear to me that it's worthwhile to start
> > a parallel py3.6 branch right now, as it'll just be merging hell for
> > the next 6 months.  Well, I suppose it's your hell, so I can't
> > complain on my own :-)
>
> Hey,
>
> I’m not intending to do much more with it, I would rather help w/ 3.5 like
> you’re suggesting.
>
> In the past there’s always been others who were eager to hack on the
> latest 3.x, so somebody was bound to start this branch at some point
> anyway. I figured I’d do the work of the merge now, and carefully — we’ve
> unfortunately had some issues with this large 3.x vendor merge in the past
> =]
>
> I also got a quick look at 3.6 and the gratification of more closely
> chasing the head of cpython after all these years.
>
> —
> Philip Jenvey
> _______________________________________________
> pypy-dev mailing list
> pypy-dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
>
_______________________________________________
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Reply via email to