On Wednesday 26 November 2003 9:51 pm, Eron Lloyd wrote: > On Tuesday November 25 2003 1:15 pm, Phil Thompson wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 November 2003 2:15 am, Eron Lloyd wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > Is anyone doing anything major with the qtxml package? Is XML support > > > in PyQt experimental? Perhaps I would be better to rely on another > > > package for now...I also see the none of the SAX stuff is wrapped or > > > exposed. If qtxml was good enough, it'd be one less package I'd need to > > > add to my project. > > > > There's nothing experimental about qtxml - it's no different to any of > > the other modules. > > > > The SAX stuff isn't wrapped simply because nobody has asked for it. > > > > Personally, I use PyXML - and the Jones & Drake book. > > Ah, I see. The more I learn, I guess PyQt isn't as automated a wrapping as > I had originally imagined. I thought that just about every class was > available.
Those that have been implemented are documented as such. > Reading deeper into the code, I notice things like Qt Properties > aren't available directly. I assume once SIP 4 solidifies this will become > easier? I've no plan to implement properties as I don't see them adding anything particularly useful. > As far as SAX support goes, it might be convenient to have, or at > least mention the exclusion in the docs. The fatc that they are not documented means they are not implemented. > Looking at the huge(!) map of > classes in the Qt doc, I must imagine providing all that functionality is > quite a task. Is there anything not implemented that hasn't been because no > one requested? The SAX stuff is probably the biggest group of classes that hasn't been implemented but could be done easily. Phil _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde