On Friday 14 May 2004 19:35, Phil Thompson wrote: > > Yes, it looks like that was the same bug.
Nice. Since you supplied no patch, I will check that tomorrow.. > > BTW: What happened to sipgen/gencode.c.patch (attached)? I > > haven't checked, if it's needed, but applies cleanly to sip 4 > > (20040510). > > The code is already included - I wouldn't expect it to apply > cleanly. Well with some fuzz, and resulted in that sequence doubled.. > > Also, I found an unspecified patch in SuSEs build (sip.diff). > > Would you take a look into and check if it is really necessary? > > At least, it also apply cleanly and does no user visible harm, > > but I hate unspecified patches.. > > It's not necessary - the same code already appears a few lines > further down. Well, you're right. Stupid me. Sorry for bothering. Will check such stuff myself before troubling next time.. Sorry again. Pete _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde