On Thursday 17 February 2005 11:45 pm, Gerard Vermeulen wrote: > On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:59:53 -0000 (GMT) > "Phil Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ .. ] > > > >> A self-installing > > >> binary package, with the Qt libraries statically linked > > > > > > Is there a reason for being statically linked? Thats a complication for > > > third > > > party python modules that use the C++ Qt API, and want to play nicely > > > with PyQt > > > > The binary package is for the GPL version only - just to make it as easy > > as possible for people new to Python and/or PyQt to get started. If > > people need more flexibility, then they can always re-build themselves > > from source. > > Does it mean you are going to provide a package where libQtCore is > statically linked against each of the (PyQt4.)QtCore, QtGui, QtNetWork, > QtOpenGL, QtSql, and QtXml modules?
Whatever it takes - but this is all hand waving at the moment. > Will the Qt-designer be included? That would make sense. > Wouldn't it be better to base the Windows version on a separate Windows > package for Qt? I want to keep it as simple as possible (for me) - I don't intend answering dozens of emails from Windows users who have picked up a copy from a magazine's cover CD. > It would be great if the Trolls release Qt4 installers for > Windows. Agreed. Phil _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list PyKDE@mats.imk.fraunhofer.de http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
