Patrick K. O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Is this compatible with a bulk Python 2.4, or do we need a MinGW-compiled >>> Python? >> >> >> Standard Python 2.4. >> >> I think MinGW has been fixed so that you don't need to go through the >> previous hassle of creating a MinGW version of the Python DLL. At least I >> haven't seen any problems so far. > > I think it is Python that got "fixed" and now includes the proper files > to be compatible with MinGW-compiled extensions. It might be nice if > website pages that point out the need to compile Python with MinGW were > updated to reflect the fact that that is no longer required with Python > 2.4 (and might not be for 2.3.5, either, though I haven't checked).
I don't remember this being mentioned in the Python release notes as well, but it could be my faulty memory :) -- Giovanni Bajo _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list PyKDE@mats.imk.fraunhofer.de http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
