+1 for pyqt4.
and for another question. does any body has some informaiton of pyqwt.
when will it have a pyqt4' version?
2006/5/11, Patrick Stinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
pnot ony is it stable, but you can get a system up and running using
pyqt4 very fast, considering trolltech releases windows binaries on
their site. I found the build to be very smooth using gcc4 on OS X,
and although it required an intermediate step or too on my gentoo
linux machine, the process worked very well. go for it, and do it
soon.
lykke til! (eller spoer trollene...)
On 5/11/06, Sreeram Kandallu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PyQt4 has been quite stable for many months now! I ported a reasonably
> large application from PyQt3 to PyQt4 in February, and the app has been
> very stable all thru!
>
> Regards
> Sreeram
>
> Frode Øijord wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am currently developing an application using Qt 3.3.4 and PyQt 3.16. I
> > would like to port to Qt4/PyQt4 as soon as possible, and was wondering
> > about the PyQt4 beta release. Would anyone recommend using it now, or
> > are there issues that need to be worked out before porting?
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PyKDE mailing list PyKDE@mats.imk.fraunhofer.de
> http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
>
>
>
>
--
Patrick Kidd Stinson
http://www.patrickkidd.com/
http://pkaudio.sourceforge.net/
http://pksampler.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
PyKDE mailing list PyKDE@mats.imk.fraunhofer.de
http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
_______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list PyKDE@mats.imk.fraunhofer.de http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
