On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:47:16 +0100, "Paul A. Giannaros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Phil Thompson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've published a development roadmap for PyQt at >> http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/software/pyqt/roadmap. > > > Great to see it all composed together. There's a minor bug in the > example that creates a signal that uses string argument names ( > ...pyqtSignal(['int', ['QString']) ).
Fixed - thanks. > Not very pleased about having to declare the version to use the more > pythonic API. I'm sure you've debated it already, but is it really > that hard for users to not upgrade their PyQt version if a particular > program relies on it? I guess that forcing a large update won't make > all of the big users happy, though. I'm not sure I understand. Of course people will have to upgrade if an application makes use of new features. However, people who upgrade for other reasons shouldn't be forced to change their existing applications at the same time. Phil _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
