Dnia poniedziałek 01 grudzień 2008, piotr maliński napisał(a): > In theory there can be more than one widget-handler for the same thing > (default QScintilla editor could be overriden with for example Kate > KPart if someone uses KDE). So using all those KParts would be cool, > but if I would use them as required dependency - I get KDE related app > (and I want it to be more flexible). Ah, sorry, mentioning Konqueror and Dolphin - and the whole app being Qt-based - made me think you were going to write primarily KDE-targeted an app (so the deps wouldn't be a problem). It would be a cool thing to be able to use KParts should one want to/like to. Anyway, just an idea for version 1.x. ;)
> Will PyDingo widgets-handlers be KParts - on this stage no. One thing > is how to make a KPart in PyQt4/PyKDE4, second - my "widget-handlers" > are ~ nearly independent apps, except for the navigation menu, which > is connected with run.py - so exact KPart from this wouldn't work, but > the widget backed will be easy to reuse and make KPart if needed :) Great! If there will be a possibility to "package" the widgets as KParts, it would contribute a lot to the overall KDE flexibility (one could use your editor widget as an alternative KPart in Konqueror or KWrite, and the "stats://" widget in Konqueror and Dolphin). Had I only the time, I would brobably dive into KParting those widgets myself... eh. Cheers mike _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
