I prefer Sphinx. On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Phil Thompson <p...@riverbankcomputing.com>wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 18:06:12 +0100, Detlev Offenbach > <det...@die-offenbachs.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > please include the PyQt4 documentation as a compressed Qt Help files > > (*.qch) > > as well. eric4 will support Qt Help collections starting with the first > 4.4 > > > > snapshot. > > An opportune moment to ask for opinions... > > When I (eventually) get round to improving the PyQt docs (particularly > making the API reference more Pythonic) it will be designed to support (in > theory) multiple output styles. In the Roadmap I specifically mention the > traditional Qt style and Sphinx (ie. that used for the Python v2.6 > documentation). > > Which of these two styles do people prefer? > > Phil > _______________________________________________ > PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com > http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt > -- Doug Nichols dou...@gmail.com http://dnwnichols.home.comcast.net/
_______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
