On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:14:42 +0100 "Tony Lynch" <tly...@xype.com> wrote:
> Qt is much better than wx in general, and more widely used. I'd go for > Qt/PyQt every time, One pro for wx might be using native toolkits and (probably) looking better which is possible concern on Windows & Mac OS X platforms? Sincerely, Gour -- As fire is covered by smoke, as a mirror is covered by dust, or as the embryo is covered by the womb, the living entity is similarly covered by different degrees of this lust. http://www.atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
