On Wednesday 28 April 2010 15:46:47 Matti Airas wrote: > > Another point, this time regarding keyword arguments, I guess that we > > should follow Qt names, not the PyQt names, ok, I must admit that I'm > > saying this just because follow the Qt ones is easier to implement, > > hehehe, because the C++ parser knows the Qt argument names, but not the > > PyQt ones. Anyway I guess that PyQt is using the Qt argument names. > > In my opinion following the Qt names would be a sensible default.
The question is actually not about the defaults, but how to handle changes - that will in turn determine the relation to PyQt (in this sense, this is not really a PyQt API compatibility question, but rather a binding backwards compatibility question). There are plenty of new Qt classes, especially in the Declarative/QtMobility segment which might present such cases. Regards, Attila _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
