On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Matti Airas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08.09.2010 16:26, ext Darren Dale wrote: > >> What is the value of calling it Property instead of pyqtProperty? > > When discussing PSEP 100, the general agreement was that since we're not > aiming for a PyQt clone but an independent and (I hope) better binding > (while still highly valuing compatiblity), we shouldn't mimic every > questionable PyQt feature blindly. Here, in particular, carrying the name in > a specific implementation in the function names (pyqtSignal & pyqtSlot) was > found unnecessary. The Property PSEP draft follows the convention created in > PSEP 100. > > As for keeping the compatibility, if anyone could contribute a compatibility > module (or document suitable boilerplate code) to map the incompatibilities > between PySide and PyQt, that would be an absolutely great contribution!
Alternatively, one could use the lib2to3 module to create a "PyQt to PySide" conversion utility: http://docs.python.org/library/2to3.html Regards, -- Anderson Lizardo OpenBossa Labs - INdT Manaus - Brazil _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
